Ethereum: How two different functions name can have same function signature?

I can help you understand this code snippet and explain what is happening.

Ethereum Function Signature

In Ethereum, functions are declared using the keyword “function” followed by a name, parameters, return types, and any required keywords. The signature of a function is defined as follows:

• returnType: The data type of the value returned by the function.

• params: A list of parameter names, their types, and optional default values.

• name: The name of the function.

• keywords: Optional keywords that can be used to modify the behavior of the function.

Code

Let’s analyze the code you provided:

cast sig "workMyDirefulOwner(uint256,uint256)"
0xa9059cbb...

Here’s an analysis:

• sig: This is a keyword in Solidity that means “signature”. It is used to declare function signatures.

• "workMyDirefulOwner": This is the name of the function, which can be thought of as the “name”.

• (uint256,uint256): These are the names and types of the parameters. The first two parameters (uint256) are 32-bit unsigned integers, while the third parameter (also uint256) is also a 32-bit unsigned integer.

• %: This keyword indicates that sig should be treated as a name rather than an address or type.

What happens?

The code converts sig "workMyDirefulOwner" to have the signature ("workMyDirefulOwner", 32, 32). Here’s what happens:

• The first parameter is now a string literal "workMyDirefulOwner", which can be thought of as an address.

• The second and third parameters are always of type uint256, which means they are 32-bit unsigned integers.

Why does this make sense?

In Solidity, function names are usually used as addresses or types when defining a new function. When you define a function with the same name but different parameter and data types, this is often called overloading' orparameter hiding’.

By converting sig "workMyDirefulOwner" to (uint256,uint256), we are essentially creating an overloaded version of the original function signature. This allows us to use the same name for a different set of parameters, while still being treated as an address or type.

Example Use Case

Here is an example that illustrates this concept:

pragma solidity ^0x6ba95ecddd5af9f3cde8b4cf2bfabe3ed452e1cd;
function myFunction(uint256 _x, uint256 _y) public {
// ...
}
function anotherMyFunction(uint256 _x, uint256 _y) public {
// ...
}
uint256 sig = myFunction("workMyDirefulOwner", 0x1234567890123456789);
anotherMyFunction(sig, 0x2345678901234567);

In this example we define two different functions myFunction and notherMyFunction, both with the same name, but different parameter and data types.

When we convert sig "workMyDirefulOwner", we get an address that can be used to call either function. When we pass that address to “anotherMyFunction”, it calls the second version of the function, which uses the original parameter type and data type.

ethereum what notation